I had the honour of taking part in a panel session discussing How Does Accessibility Fit into Today’s Usability Practice? at the Usability Professionals’ Association Conference (UPA 2010) in Munich last week. The session was organised by Shawn Henry of the W3C Web Accessibility Initiative and provided an opportunity to debate the challenges of promoting and supporting accessible ICT design within a wider usability context. A number of interesting discussion points emerged – here are my reflections on the panel session.
May 31, 2010
The role of accessibility in the usability profession today – and tomorrow
Posted by David Sloan under Accessibility and Usability | Tags: accessibility, advocacy, communication, conference, HCI, ICT, innovation, older people, pragmatism, upa2010, usability |[2] Comments
March 10, 2009
Sweetness follows?
Posted by David Sloan under Accessibility and Usability | Tags: accessibility, advocacy, pragmatism, standards, validation, web |1 Comment
There have been reports in the UK press of plans to reduce the speed limit of traffic on rural roads from 60 to 50 miles per hour (96 to 80km/h). The main argument, of course, is to improve road safety, but there is also an argument that speed limits on their own do not necessarily lead to safer drivers:
- a speed limit may imply that driving at, or just below, that limit automatically means ‘safe’.
- a safe driving speed depends on context – weather, time, road condition, surrounding environment, visibility, to name but a few factors.
